Boutique by Design - International by Instinct

/
/
Nikita Panse

Nikita Panse

Senior Associate

Nikita is a dual-qualified Solicitor specialising in international arbitration and related court proceedings. She has comprehensive experience in international commercial, construction, and investment arbitrations with the ICC, LCIA, SIAC, ICSID, and SCC, and several prominent seats including London, Paris, Singapore, Geneva, and the Abu Dhabi Global Market.

Nikita has worked on construction and energy arbitrations arising out of projects in Asia, Latin America, North Africa, India, and the Middle East. Project examples include offshore wind, solar, natural gas extraction, mining of non-metallic minerals, manufacture of maritime vessels, and construction of mixed-use real estate projects.

Before joining Hamish Lal Partners, Nikita worked at the Paris and London offices of a leading boutique arbitration practice. She worked as an Associate in the disputes practices of reputed Mumbai-based law firms. She was engaged as Tribunal Secretary for the SACU-Safeguards arbitration between the European Union and Southern African Customs Union. She acted as a research assistant for a prominent public international law specialist and contributed to seminal Oxford and Cambridge University Press publications on topics including mixed claims commissions and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (rebus sic stantibus). She has been published in leading peer-reviewed journals including:

  • Multiplicity in International Arbitration – Procedural Solutions in Matthias Scherer and Catherine A. Kunz (eds), ASA Bulletin, Volume 43, Issue 4 (2025).
  • ICC-administered international construction arbitration seated in London with English law concerning a solar power project located in Brazil between Asian and South American entities. Issues in dispute include withdrawal ‘with prejudice’ versus dismissal of claims under English law and Article 38 (6) of the ICC Rules 2021, and recovery of indemnity costs.
  • SIAC-administered international construction arbitration seated in Singapore with Singapore law concerning an offshore wind farm project located in Asia between European entities. Issues in dispute include delay, quantum, and change in law resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and procedural issues such as adverse inferences due to deficient document production.
  • Annulment proceedings before the Svea Court of Appeal challenging an SCC tribunal’s partial final award upholding jurisdiction in an international investment arbitration.
  • Enforcement proceedings before the Bombay High Court for an award rendered in a SIAC-administered international commercial arbitration concerning maritime vessel manufacture.
  • ICC-administered international construction arbitration seated in Paris with French law concerning a natural gas extraction project in North Africa.
  • Ad hoc international commercial arbitration seated in London with English law concerning debt claims arising out of bareboat charterparty agreements.
  • UNCITRAL-governed international investment arbitration initiated by a Middle Eastern entity concerning a cement production project in North Africa.
  • Solicitor, England & Wales 
  • Advocate, India
  • LLM (magna cum laude) in Transnational Arbitration and Dispute Settlement, Institut d’Études Politiques de Paris (Sciences Po) (partial tuition-fee waiver scholarship), 2021
  • BSL LLB (First Class), ILS Law College, India, 2017
  • Diploma in International Business Laws and Commercial Laws in India (First Class), Symbiosis Law College, India, 2014
  • Mentor, Indian Women in International Arbitration
  • Council Member, Young India Council, Society of Construction Law, India
  • Society of Construction Law, UK
  • Young LCIA
  • English
  • French
  • Hindi
  • Marathi

Insights

/

The maxim of ne ultra petita is well-understood. But, Tribunals also enjoy discretion to conduct arbitrations efficiently. What happens when these two concepts clash? What if the parties do not seek a particular relief, but a tribunal orders it believing such relief aids efficiency?   The Paris Court of Appeal considered the above in Tecnimont […]

/

The Singapore High Court in DRL v DRK [2026] SGHC 32 upheld an Award rendered by a SIAC-administered arbitral tribunal which had terminated an arbitration on the basis that it was impossible to proceed with the arbitration due to sanctions. The situation is nuanced. We say this because – different to Singapore – Courts in […]

/

Hamish Lal was the Presiding Arbitrator of a Tribunal that also included Sir Patterson Cheltenham (former Chief Justice of Barbados) and Ms Vicki Telford B. Arch, MBC, FCIArb, RA, BIA. The Tribunal sat at the University of the West Indies on 26 February 2026 at the Final Hearing of the Berrys International Commercial Arbitration Moot Competition […]

/

Hamish Lal has been Author of Part A of the Manual of Construction Agreements, published by LexisNexis, since 2015. The Manual of Construction Agreements is a comprehensive guide to the law and practice governing construction contracts, with a focus on the major standard form agreements. Part A provides an in‑depth analysis of the relevant areas […]

/

Hamish Lal has been both General Editor and the International Case Note Editor of the Construction Law Journal, published by Sweet & Maxwell, since 2022. Ece Tahan is Editorial Assistant of the Construction Law Journal. The Construction Law Journal provides an authoritative forum to which construction law professionals can turn for guidance, comment, and informed […]

/

Case law on FIDIC Contracts is always instructive. In Uniform Building Contractors Ltd v Water and Sewerage Authority of Trinidad and Tobago [2026] UKPC 2, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council looked at the FIDIC Yellow Book (1999 Edition). The Judgment provides authoritative guidance on (i) the proper analysis of variations; (ii) the limits […]

© Copyright 2026 – Hamish Lal Partners