Boutique by Design - International by Instinct
Sara read European Law and Politics. She is a Senior Paralegal and provides high-level legal support and data management. She assists with pre-arbitral processes, paralegal team leadership, and collaborating with third-party document management providers.
Sara is fluent in Czech, English, and Slovak and elementary in Spanish, which allows her to bring a multilingual and multicultural approach to our work. Before joining Hamish Lal Partners, she gained substantial legal experience as an assistant in a leading Czech law firm. She has also worked at a boutique law firm in London where she managed office administration and assisted in drafting various legal documents.
For her undergraduate studies, Sara pursued an LLB in European Law and Politics in London where she participated in mooting. She wrote her dissertation on “Legal Challenges and Protection of Transgender and Intersex People’s Rights in the Member States of the European Union and the Council of Europe”. She has also dedicated her time to study Czech Law to expand her legal knowledge.
The US Supreme Court has been asked to clarify the legal regime governing non-signatories to arbitration agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act. In particular, the Court is now asked to resolve whether state law principles of equitable estoppel apply to a claim to extend an arbitration agreement, or whether “federal common law” derived from a […]
Apportionment of liability amongst participants in an unincorporated joint venture is complex. Such complexity is increased when one participant is in dispute with the joint venture and the absence of arbitration joinder means that there are two arbitrations. This gives rise to questions of the boundary of jurisdiction of each Tribunal and to questions about […]
Arbitral awards are rarely set aside. In DWL v DWM,[1] the Singapore High Court dismissed an application to set-aside an arbitral award for excess of jurisdiction or breach of natural justice. Eminent judges have been clear “there is a difference between, on the one hand, a party having no opportunity to address a point or […]
In JKD and anor v IKC,[1] the English High Court dismissed a challenge under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 to an arbitral Order refusing to restrain a call on a bond. This is another important case because it reinforces the thinking that section 68 challenges apply only to Awards (not arbitral Orders) and […]
In DSS v DST,[1] the Singapore High Court found that an award, where 108 out of the 211 paragraphs were wholesale or substantial reproductions of excerpts from a related award, was not rendered in breach of natural justice. The Claimant said that the reproductions were not limited to reciting of uncontroversial procedural matters but “extend […]
In TTSJV W.L.L and others v BapCo Refining B.S.C (TTSJV),[1] the English High Court dismissed an application for an injunction against a bond call. Applications to restrain bond calls are difficult, given the high threshold. London has reaffirmed the position that a call on an ‘on-demand’ bond can only be restrained in cases of fraud […]
